Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
roselightfairy: (Default)
Did some work on a piece of real-life Tolkien Scholarship I am trying to work on and I just had to share some notes that I jotted down that made me go absolutely feral and want to tear paint off walls with my teeth:

Note here: some reflection on the symbolism of Lothlórien itself? Lothlórien is a space that you do not emerge from “unchanged,” a space of mystery to the rest of Middle-earth - even Legolas doesn’t seem to be quite sure whether there are still elves there or not, and so it is regarded with wonder and suspicion by others from other kingdoms. It is significant that they become friends here, in this space of privacy, in this space where reality feels slowed down and time passes differently (especially since time is such a feature of their future, with their mortal/immortal friendship). It is also significant that this wood is where Arwen and Aragorn - Tolkien’s explicit het love story, also interspecies - pledged themselves to one another. It is the place where their journeys leave their expected paths and begin to diverge to follow one another (“two roads diverged in a yellow wood” and they followed each other onto the one less traveled by I am going to LOSE IT)

(yes I am writing Real Actual Tolkien Scholarship on how Legolas and Gimli are in love, I'm not even kidding)
roselightfairy: (Default)
Apropos of absolutely nothing in particular definitely, you wanna know who I think the worst kind of people are? The kind of people who are pretentiously incomprehensible, who name-drop obscure theorists as though they're movie stars, who use hyperspecific jargon not because they're assuming you know what it means but because they know you don't. They say things that don't make any sense but sound smart because they know you'll either have to ask what they mean or pretend you know when you don't, to avoid their smug explanations (which usually name-drop a few other obscure people in the process and only make it worse). The point of speaking isn't to share knowledge, it's to show off their own. It's the worst kind of posturing, and although I try to squelch it in myself, I know I have the tendency, too . . .

. . . but that doesn't mean I like it any better when it's done to me.
roselightfairy: (Default)
me, revising an old piece of academic writing: *adds a sarcastic comment*
roselightfairy: (Default)
1) People who ask irrelevant questions solely to show off their own knowledge:
a. rambling for five minutes about something unrelated to the topic at hand and then either
i. trailing off into expectant silence and waiting for the presenter to figure out the question, or
ii. realizing they're not really asking a question and ending their self-important ramble with, "Can you speak to that?"
b. using a great deal of jargon (which the speaker did not introduce) that assumes a lot of specialized knowledge on the part of the presenter and the audience in order to ask a question only obliquely related to the purpose of the actual talk

2) "My question has two parts..."

3) Explaining the presenter's own subject to them.

Feel free to add your own!

Profile

roselightfairy: (Default)
roselightfairy

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 01:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios